Prediction of Elizabeth Anselm vs Dorothy Jensen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Anselm vs D. Jensen

Elizabeth Anselm
Elizabeth Anselm

Flag USA USA

l
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
Dorothy Jensen
Dorothy Jensen

Flag USA USA

l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

116
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Anselm 1 - 0 Jensen

They have played 2 sets in total, with Elizabeth Anselm winning 2 and Dorothy Jensen winning 0. The last match between Elizabeth Anselm and Dorothy Jensen was at the Los Angeles Municipal Members, 23-10-1932, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Elizabeth Anselm getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Anselm1
Jensen0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4Los Angeles Municipal Members(10-23-32)

Hard
USA Flag
Elizabeth Anselm
6
6
USA Flag
Dorothy Jensen
3
4

E. Anselm vs D. Jensen H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
42.86% (6-8)Career Total W/L0.00% (0-3)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

E. Anselm vs D. Jensen Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Elizabeth Anselm has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Dorothy Jensen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Elizabeth Anselm, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dorothy Jensen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Elizabeth Anselm has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dorothy Jensen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Elizabeth Anselm has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Dorothy Jensen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Elizabeth Anselm has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 100% (W/L 3/0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Dorothy Jensen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 100% (W/L 0/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
  • Player level: In the last year, Elizabeth Anselm has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Dorothy Jensen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Elizabeth Anselm winning 1 times and Dorothy Jensen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Elizabeth Anselm winning 2 and Dorothy Jensen winning 0.
  • The last match between Elizabeth Anselm and Dorothy Jensen was at the Los Angeles Municipal Members, 23-10-1932, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Elizabeth Anselm getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Elizabeth Anselm has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Dorothy Jensen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Elizabeth Anselm has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dorothy Jensen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Elizabeth Anselm has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dorothy Jensen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Elizabeth Anselm vs Dorothy Jensen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Anselm vs D. Jensen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won7
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Anselm 0%, Jensen 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Anselm 0%, Jensen 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Anselm 0%, Jensen 0%.

E. Anselm Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayMinneapolis - 13-08-1934

R4

USAL. Hofmeister
L
W/O
N/ATucson - 12-10-1933

F

USAL. Cooper
W
6-0 6-1
N/ASalt Lake City Intermountain - 29-08-1933

F

USAR. Crow
W
6-1 6-2
N/ATucson State - 24-04-1933

F

USAB. Lidell
W
2-6 6-3 6-4
HardLos Angeles Metro - 15-01-1933

R3

USAG. Wheeler
L
6-1 6-3

D. Jensen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardLos Angeles Industrial - 22-04-1934

USAD. Devries
L
6-0 6-2
HardLos Angeles Metro - 07-01-1934

Q1

USAD. Pettes
L
6-3 2-6 6-2
HardLos Angeles Municipal Members - 23-10-1932

R4

USAE. Anselm
L
6-3 6-4
banner

E. Anselm vs D. Jensen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
42.86% (6/8)YTD Win/Loss0.00% (0/3)
53.57% (15/13)Sets Win/Loss14.29% (1/6)
50.21% (118/117)Games Win/Loss34.48% (20/38)
30.00% (3/7)Hard Win/Loss0.00% (0/3)
0.00% (0/1)Clay Win/Loss0% (0/0)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
50% (6/12)Best of 3 Sets Win %0% (0/3)
25% (1/4)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
71% (7/5)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
29% (7/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
20% (5/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (3/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
UKRO. Prihodko
BELB. Gadamauri
W1
1.81
W2
1.87
12:35 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Bondioli
ITAF. Moroni
W1
2.06
W2
1.666
07:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ESPN. Sanchez-Izquierdo
ITAF. Agamenone
W1
1.98
W2
1.72
04:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
EGYM. B. SobhyWC
BIHM. Basic
W1
2.375
W2
1.5
12:05 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. Agostini
GBRM. Summers
W1
8.7
W2
1.028
10:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. Travaglia
CROM. Dodig
W1
1.89
W2
1.79